Skip to main content
Knowledge-Pathway-Hero-image

BOND Research to BOND Clinical Translation Guide

Updated Date: 5 October 2026

Supporting Assay Development with a Pathway Toward Clinical Deployment

Develop Today. Translate Tomorrow.

Biomarker and companion diagnostic programs can lose momentum when promising research assays must be redeveloped, re-optimized, or substantially reworked before they can move toward clinical implementation. The BOND RX and BOND RXm research systems support assay development in a flexible research environment while keeping future BOND clinical ecosystem considerations in view from the start.

Built within the broader BOND staining ecosystem, these research systems align with the technology, workflow, and reagent foundations used across Leica Biosystems clinical platforms, helping teams plan a more direct and efficient path to clinical translation.

Image
Develop Today. Translate Tomorrow
Figure 1: BOND platforms. Planning for the future

Why Develop on the BOND RX and BOND RXm Research Systems?

Researchers require flexibility to explore biomarkers, investigate novel workflows, and optimize assay performance. Clinical systems, by design, operate within a more controlled environment intended to support diagnostic laboratory workflows. When the research platform and the intended clinical deployment environment differ substantially, teams may face redevelopment, revalidation, workflow redesign, retraining, readiness delays, and increased cost.

The key benefit of developing within the BOND ecosystem is not that transfer is automatic. Instead, the research and clinical pathway can be planned against shared technology foundations, common workflow principles, and a related reagent and protocol environment from the beginning.

Image
Why Develop on the BOND RX and BOND RXm Research Systems
Figure 2: Platform to outcome alignment

Shared Technology Foundations

Common Staining Technology

The Leica Biosystems BOND research platforms and BOND clinical platforms are positioned around common staining technology foundations. This includes comparable workflow principles, fluidics design philosophy, reagent ecosystem, and protocol execution framework. By enabling assay development within the broader BOND ecosystem, researchers can focus on scientific innovation while maintaining awareness of future clinical deployment objectives.

Image
Shared Technology Foundations
Figure 3: Alignment Across the BOND Ecosystem

Shared Applications

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
  • In Situ Hybridization (ISH)
  • Chromogenic multiplex assays
  • Fluorescent multiplex assays
  • Translational biomarker studies
  • Companion diagnostic feasibility programs
  • Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) development

Common Software Foundation

BOND Research and BOND Clinical software applications are built upon a common software foundation.

The primary differences between research and clinical software environments relate to:

  • User permissions
  • Protocol editing capabilities
  • Available workflow features
  • Research-specific functionality
  • Clinical workflow controls

Research and Clinical Environment Comparison

Capability BOND Research Systems BOND Clinical Systems
Protocol flexibility Extensive Controlled
Sequential multiplexing Up to 6-plex Up to 4-plex
Research assay development Yes Limited
Clinical workflow controls Limited Enhanced

Shared Reagent Ecosystem

Many Leica Biosystems reagents are available across both BOND research and clinical environments, including:

  • BOND Ready-to-Use antibodies
  • BOND Detection Systems
  • BOND Epitope Retrieval Solutions
  • BOND Wash Solutions
  • BOND Ancillary Reagents

Choosing clinically relevant IVD reagent families during development can reduce avoidable changes when transitioning from research to clinical implementation. Unlike RUO reagents, IVD reagents are supported by documented performance characteristics and controlled product information—such as stability, shelf-life and lot-to-lot consistency data—providing greater confidence when planning a future clinical assay.

Designing for Future Clinical Translation

Organizations intending to transfer assays from research into a clinical environment should consider future deployment requirements during assay development.

Early consideration of transfer requirements may reduce downstream redevelopment effort and help avoid unnecessary technical challenges.

Examples include:

Image
Designing for Future Clinical Translation
Figure 4: Key considerations when designing an assay for future clinical translation.

Research-to-Clinical Assay Development Pathway

A typical translational development pathway may include:

Image
Research-to-Clinical Assay Development Pathway
Figure 5: Research to Clinical Assay Deployment Pathway

The exact pathway will depend on:

  • Intended use
  • Regulatory pathway
  • Geographic market
  • Assay complexity
  • Sponsor quality requirements

Leica Biosystems: Enabling and Supporting Clinical Translation

Leica Biosystems supports clinical translation in two complementary ways.

  1. A clinical-ready ecosystem
    The BOND ecosystem provides access to established clinical platforms and a broad portfolio of detection systems, antibodies, retrieval solutions, wash solutions and ancillary reagents. Selecting clinically relevant platform components early may reduce avoidable changes, redevelopment and technical uncertainty when an assay moves toward clinical implementation.
  2. A development partner for clinical and companion diagnostic programs
    Beyond supplying platforms and reagents, Leica Biosystems can collaborate with customers throughout the development pathway—from early feasibility and assay optimisation to clinical development, evidence generation, regulatory planning and commercial deployment. Our clinical and companion diagnostic development capabilities enable customers to engage the expertise, infrastructure and support needed at each stage of the journey.
Image
Scaling with Leica Biosystems
Figure 6: Scaling with Leica Biosystems

Leica Biosystems can work with customers to identify factors that may influence future transfer strategies and implementation planning.

Factors That May Affect Transferability

BOND research and clinical systems share relevant foundations, but transferability of a specific assay depends on the details of assay design and the sponsor’s intended clinical application.

Factors that may require additional assessment include:

Consideration Potential Impact
Custom reagents Additional development effort
Research-only antibodies Clinical suitability assessment
Novel chemistries Additional verification
High-order multiplex designs Clinical implementation review
Workflow customizations Clinical compatibility assessment
Regulatory requirements Validation and documentation needs
Intended use claims Transfer planning considerations

Identifying these factors early can simplify future deployment planning.

Clinical Translation Expertise in Practice

RNAscope Technology Translation

A practical example of research-to-clinical translation within the BOND ecosystem is Leica Biosystems' collaboration with Bio-Techne Spatial (original partnership with Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Research users may perform RNAscope workflows on BOND RX staining system using research reagents, like the RNAscope 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit (Brown, while related RNAscope-based solutions are also available within the BOND clinical ecosystem through BOND RNAscope Detection Reagents – Brown*.

This example demonstrates how technologies initially deployed within research environments can subsequently be adapted for clinical workflow deployment when appropriate development, validation, and regulatory activities are completed.

*BOND RNAscope products intended use and regulatory status depends on the specific product and region.

Image
EBER RNAscope staining performed on the BOND-III automated staining platform
Figure 7: EBER RNAscope staining performed on the BOND-III automated staining platform.

Clinical Adoption of the BOND Ecosystem

The BOND clinical ecosystem has been used with FDA-cleared and approved products.

Examples include:

BOND Oracle HER2 IHC System

The BOND Oracle HER2 IHC System is FDA PMA approved for use on BOND-MAX clinical instruments and represents one example of a clinically deployed assay within the BOND ecosystem.

BOND MMR Antibody Panel

Image
MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 staining performed using the Leica Biosystems BOND MMR antibody panel on the BOND-III automated staining platform
Figure 8: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 staining performed using the Leica Biosystems BOND MMR antibody panel on the BOND-III automated staining platform.

The BOND MMR Antibody Panel received FDA 510(k) clearance (K213348) for use on BOND-MAX and BOND-III clinical systems.

Companion Diagnostic Collaborations

Leica Biosystems has publicly disclosed collaborations with pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations for companion diagnostic development and commercialization.

These examples demonstrate adoption of BOND clinical platforms but do not imply regulatory approval or clearance of customer-developed assays.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I develop an assay on BOND RX research system and later transfer it to BOND-III clinical system?

Transfer suitability depends on the assay design, reagents, protocol, intended use, target market and required verification, validation, and regulatory activities. The customer should engage Leica Biosystems early to assess the most appropriate transfer strategy.

Are the staining technologies aligned between research and clinical systems?

Yes. Leica Biosystems designed BOND research systems and BOND clinical systems using common technology foundations, workflow architecture, protocol execution principles, and reagent ecosystems.

Can BOND research systems support studies that may contribute to a future regulatory submission?

Organizations may conduct research and assay-development activities on BOND research systems. Acceptability of resulting data for regulatory purposes remains the responsibility of the assay sponsor and applicable regulatory authorities.

Does protocol transfer eliminate verification or validation requirements?

No. Verification, validation, risk management, quality system compliance, and regulatory requirements remain dependent on intended use, claims, geography and the sponsor’s development pathway.

Important Regulatory Considerations

BOND research staining systems are Research Use Only (RUO) instruments and are not intended for diagnostic procedures. Transfer of an assay from a research platform to a clinical platform does not eliminate sponsor-specific responsibilities relating to:

  • Verification
  • Validation
  • Risk management
  • Regulatory submissions
  • Intended-use claims
  • Quality system compliance

Customers should consult Leica Biosystems regarding specific transfer strategies, implementation planning, and regulatory considerations.

Conclusion

BOND RX and BOND RXm research systems provide researchers with the flexibility needed to innovate while remaining aligned with the Leica Biosystems clinical staining ecosystem.

Through common technology foundations, shared reagent frameworks, aligned protocol architectures, and established clinical deployment platforms, BOND research systems can serve as an effective starting point for translational research, laboratory-developed tests, and companion diagnostic programs.

By considering future clinical objectives early in assay development and collaborating with Leica Biosystems throughout the process, organizations can reduce technical uncertainty and establish a potential pathway from biomarker discovery through to clinical implementation.

 

BOND-MAX and BOND-III are For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
BOND RXm and BOND RX are For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.


Die Inhalte des Knowledge Pathway von Leica Biosystems unterliegen den Nutzungsbedingungen der Website von Leica Biosystems, die hier eingesehen werden können: Rechtlicher Hinweis. Der Inhalt, einschließlich der Webinare, Schulungspräsentationen und ähnlicher Materialien, soll allgemeine Informationen zu bestimmten Themen liefern, die für medizinische Fachkräfte von Interesse sind. Er soll explizit nicht der medizinischen, behördlichen oder rechtlichen Beratung dienen und kann diese auch nicht ersetzen. Die Ansichten und Meinungen, die in Inhalten Dritter zum Ausdruck gebracht werden, spiegeln die persönlichen Auffassungen der Sprecher/Autoren wider und decken sich nicht notwendigerweise mit denen von Leica Biosystems, seinen Mitarbeitern oder Vertretern. Jegliche in den Inhalten enthaltene Links, die auf Quellen oder Inhalte Dritter verweisen, werden lediglich aus Gründen Ihrer Annehmlichkeit zur Verfügung gestellt.

Vor dem Gebrauch sollten die Produktinformationen, Beilagen und Bedienungsanleitungen der jeweiligen Medikamente und Geräte konsultiert werden.

Copyright © 2026 Leica Biosystems division of Leica Microsystems, Inc. and its Leica Biosystems affiliates. All rights reserved. LEICA and the Leica Logo are registered trademarks of Leica Microsystems IR GmbH.