Skip to main content

Knife Angle in Microtomy

To prepare biological tissue for observation under a microscope, the tissue is usually cut in thin slices. Most biological tissue is too soft to cut; the knife would push into it and compress it, even if the cutting edge was very sharp. Therefore, the tissue can be frozen and sectioned in a cryostat, embedded in a hardening material like paraffin or resin, or cut while still soft with a vibrating blade microtome. The correct knife angle is the subject of much misunderstanding, misleading experience, and incorrect information passed between microtomists, but in fact, can be logically derived.

Obtenga las actualizaciones de Knowledge Pathway directamente en su bandeja de entrada.
Si ha realizado un seminario web educativo de nuestra serie mensual y desea solicitar créditos de formación continua a su organización certificadora, descargue el formulario para que podamos ayudarle a añadir créditos educativos autodeclarados a su expediente académico.

Ideal versus compromise

The ideal knife for sectioning any material in any microtome, regardless of specimen hardness, would be an infinitely thin plane. This would be oriented parallel to the plane of the cutting movement. Unfortunately, infinitely thin planes are hard to come by, and in fact, are found only in geometry books.

Real knives are a compromise, or several compromises, between physics, available materials, manufacturability, and cost. They must have measurable thickness to be held stable during cutting. So, the leading edge must be made thinner than the main body of the knife, in a wedge shape, to enable both cutting and physical inflexibility. All microtome knives, whether resharpenable or disposable, have a wedge shaped part.

Fig. 1a-c: a: the correct knife angle, b: too shallow, c: too steep
Fig. 1a-c: a: the correct knife angle, b: too shallow, c: too steep
Fig. 1a-c: a: the correct knife angle, b: too shallow, c: too steep

The entire knife could in theory be a smooth wedge, with gradual slope to the leading edge. However, sharpening the knife would then require removing a layer from at least one whole face of the knife. In practice, there is always a final bevel at a steeper angle for about a millimeter back from the cutting edge. The final bevel may be symmetrical on both sides, or not. The final bevel helps with sharpening and resharpening, only the bevel face(s) surface has to be removed to sharpen.

In a microtome, the center line through the cross-section of the knife, as shown in Fig. 1a, is always positioned at an angle to the main direction of motion, not parallel to the direction of motion as it would be for an ideal infinitely thin knife. This is necessary because of the bevel. The angle is required because the knife is wedge shaped in cross section (at least the beveled leading edge of it). This compromise with the ideal knife has two negative consequences.

Consequences of too shallow an angle

Suppose the knife is held so that the plane of motion (of the knife or specimen) is parallel to the centerline through the wedge, as would be appropriate with an ideal knife (Fig. 1b). The face of the bevel on the specimen side of the knife would then be pressed hard against the specimen, increasingly so with more cutting movement and apply compressive and forward pressure to the specimen. This is never good, and there are several possible consequences that depend on the tissue properties, knife properties, and on how well the specimen is adhered to the specimen holder:

  • If the tissue is soft, the section will be cut, but the block face where the next section will come from will be compressed down and forward, abraded, and damaged. The most common result is alternating thick and thin sections (this can also occur if either the knife or the specimen holder is not tightly secured and can move under pressure).
  • If the tissue is hard, or a vibrating blade is used (see Fig. 2), the result of the pressure may be not to compress the tissue but to flex the knife upward. If the knife can be flexed, it may “skate” up out of the tissue somewhere in the interior of the intended section, separating partial fragments, or make a wavy pattern on the block surface, called "Venetian blinds", where the knife is deflected up, then springs back. Some degree of waves can happen even with the correct knife angle, due to specimen compression in front of the knife.
  • Excessive forward push on the specimen block could cause the specimen to break off the specimen holder.

The lesson here is that the knife always needs a high enough angle to prevent the trailing part of the lower bevel face from applying pressure to the specimen block.

Fig. 2: An example of a semiautomatic vibrating blade microtome that is designed for sectioning fixed or unfixed specimens in Neuropathology (fresh brain slicing) and Neurophysiology (patch-clamping). Such an instrument is recommended for users who wish to manually select the desired section thickness prior to cutting each section. The vertical deflection can be measured by using an optional measurement device.

Consequences of too steep an angle

Suppose instead that the knife is raised to a steep angle between a center line through the knife cross section and the axis of movement, so that the lower face of the wedge no longer pushes down and forward on the block (Fig. 1c). However, the upper face of the wedge is always pushing on the uncut specimen above the cutting edge. This bends the section very sharply up at the line of cut as it is separated from the specimen block. As with any object with any thickness being bent, the lower surface of the section at the bend will be stretched and some separations will occur. The upper surface will be compressed. If the deformed specimen does not spring back, the tissue will roll into a tight roll. Even if it does spring back, and is prevented from rolling, the section will be altered. It is never good to bend the section more that it has to bend given the need to push the wedge in. There are again several possible consequences, depending on the specimen and knife properties:

  • If the knife is flexible and the specimen is hard, the knife may bend down and dive down into the specimen block.
  • If the specimen is hard, it may have shatter, sometimes called "chatter", lines running parallel to the knife edge, where the hard section was sharply bent and broke.
  • If the specimen is weakly connected, the section may look more like scrapings than a smooth section.
  • A soft section may roll up in a tight roll, taking the shape given it at the line of cut.

What is the correct knife angle?

As a general principle, excessive bending of the section at the cut line is never advantageous in histology or material sectioning. However, errors of too shallow an angle are more damaging to the specimen than errors of too steep an angle. This leads inevitably to the conclusion that the correct knife angle should always be set in the following manner: Position the lower bevel face parallel to the specimen block and the plane of motion. Then raise the angle slightly (1/2 degree if you can manage such a thing) above the bevel angle to avoid having the lower bevel face slide over the specimen block and possibly produce friction damage. The correct knife angle positioning should be consistent regardless of the type of microtome or any specimen property.

The consequences of incorrect knife angle will vary because of differences in specimen types, fixation and processing qualities, and knife flexibility. Knife and disposable blade properties must also be considered because they can be manufactured with different profiles and angles. The correct knife angle is the property of both the knife and its final bevel. These characteristics may vary between manufacturers and may also change after re-sharpening.

El contenido de Leica Biosystems Knowledge Pathway está sujeto a las condiciones de uso del sitio web de Leica Biosystems, disponibles en: Aviso legal.. El contenido, incluidos los webinars o seminarios web, los recursos de formación y los materiales relacionados, está destinado a proporcionar información general sobre temas concretos de interés para los profesionales de la salud y no está destinado a ser, ni debe interpretarse como asesoramiento médico, normativo o jurídico. Los puntos de vista y opiniones expresados en cualquier contenido de terceros reflejan los puntos de vista y opiniones personales de los ponentes/autores y no representan ni reflejan necesariamente los puntos de vista ni opiniones de Leica Biosystems, sus empleados o sus agentes. Cualquier enlace incluido en el contenido que proporcione acceso a recursos o contenido de terceros se proporciona únicamente por comodidad.

Para el uso de cualquier producto, debe consultarse la documentación correspondiente del producto, incluidas las guías de información, los prospectos y los manuales de funcionamiento.

Copyright © 2023 Leica Biosystems division of Leica Microsystems, Inc. y sus filiales de Leica Biosystems. Todos los derechos reservados. LEICA y el logotipo de Leica son marcas comerciales registradas de Leica Microsystems IR GmbH.

About the presenter

Charles Scouten acquired his Ph.D from SUNY Binghamton in 1980 with a dissertation entitled “Location of Neurons Mediating Androgen’s effect on Copulation, Urine Marking, and Body Weight”.

¿Quiere que publiquemos su escrito?
Estamos buscando otros grandes escritores para publicar sus textos aquí. ¡Envíenos una solicitud y nos pondremos en contacto con usted!
¿Le gusta lo que ve?
Obtenga más contenido de Knowledge Pathway como este directamente en su bandeja de entrada. Cancele su suscripción en cualquier momento.