Warning! You won't be able to use the quotation basket until you enable cookies in your Web browser.
Warning! Your Web browser is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a modern browser.

Steps to Better ISH

From patient to pathologist, preparing tissue specimens for histological examination requires care, skill and sound procedures. This guide provides practical advice on best-practice techniques and simple ways to avoid common errors.

Tips for better ISH are highlighted in this week's guide. We hope each step provides a valuable reminder of good histology practice and also helps with troubleshooting when unacceptable results do occur.

Want to see all 101 Steps to Better Histology? Click here to download your copy today!

Step 89 - Use High Quality Sections

 Take particular care to use thin, flat sections that have been thoroughly dried onto the slide. Use charged slides for ISH.

 

 

 Uneven, poorly-adhering sections stain unevenly with variable background staining.

 

 

This poor quality section shows lifting and background staining (HPV).
Use High Quality Sections

Step 90 - In Situ Hybridization Ensure Optimal Fixation

 Good quality fixation using known and consistent fixation conditions (fixative type, pH, temperature, time) produces the best results.

 

 

 Inconsistent fixation conditions, producing under-fixed or over-fixed tissues, produce variable results and make troubleshooting difficult.

 

 

A ISH for kappa light chain mRNA on well-fixed tonsil shows a sharp, strong reaction. B ISH for kappa light chain mRNA on poorly-fixed tonsil shows a weak reaction.
In Situ Hybridization Ensure Optimal Fixation

Step 91 - Avoid Section Adhesion Problems

 Avoid the use of protein-based section adhesives in the flotation bath (glue, starch, or gelatin), particularly on charged slides.

 

 

 Protein-based adhesives can block the surface of the charged slide. This causes inconsistent adhesion and leads to uneven staining due to pooling of ISH reagents beneath lifting sections.

 

 

A line of thick protein-based section adhesive has stained adjacent to the section (breast,PR).
Avoid Section Adhesion Problems

Step 92 - Optimize Wax Removal and Reagent Application

 Take particular care with dewaxing and hydration of sections as well as efficient and uniform distribution of reagents on the specimen surface. This ensures even staining and consistent results.

 

 

 Incomplete removal of wax can produce unstained or poorly- stained areas in sections. Bubbles retained on the section surface during pretreatment or staining can cause problems.

 

 

Bubbles formed during pretreatment at 95 °C have caused uneven staining (HPV).
118 Optimize Wax Removal and Reagent Application

Step 93 - Choose Probe Carefully

 Choose your probe carefully with regard to its sensitivity and specificity.

 

 

 “We buy our probes based on price alone.”

 

 

Both sections of tonsil were stained using ISH (BCIP/NBT) for kappa light chain mRNA using oligonucleotide probes from different sources. Section A shows strong staining while section B demonstrates weaker staining with fewer cells stained.
Choose Probe Carefully

Step 94 - Read Specification Sheets

 Know your probe. Always check the specification sheet to determine the suitability of your method for a particular probe. Carefully control temperature and time to provide optimal hybridization conditions. These must be exactly right to ensure that maximum specific binding occurs.

 

 No access to the probe data sheets in the laboratory: “We just follow the standard method”.

 

 

Both sections of condyloma were stained using ISH for HPV using the same DNA probe but different hybridization conditions. Section A shows strong staining while in section B staining is unsatisfactory.
Read Specification Sheets

Step 95 - Optimize Pretreatment Conditions

 Choose appropriate pretreatment and optimization conditions. These will depend on fixation and tissue type.

 

 Use of the same enzyme pretreatment conditions for different probes may sometimes produce poor results.

 

 

This section of colon has been stained with a Poly d(T) positive control probe. The section demonstrates the result of over-digestion with Proteinase K. Note the loss of cytoplasmic structure in the mucosal epithelium and heavy background staining.
Optimize Pretreatment Conditions

Step 96 - Handle Tissue Carefully

 Careful handling of tissue specimens and prompt fixation will limit the loss of RNA by the action of endogenous RNAses.

 

 Careless handling of tissue specimens and delayed fixation will encourage the loss of RNA by the action of endogenous RNAses.

 

Weak staining due to the breakdown of nuclear RNA by RNAses. Tonsil stained with a Poly d(T) positive control probe.
Handle Tissue Carefully

Step 97 - Use Appropriate Detection System

 Choose a sensitive detection and visualization system and optimize incubation conditions.

 

 A lack of sensitivity in the detection and visualization system can result in very weak or even negative staining even though the probe is bound to a target.

 

The weak staining in this section of tonsil is due to a lack of sensitivity in the detection system. ISH for lambda light chain using a non-polymer detection kit.
Use Appropriate Detection System

Step 98 - Avoid Reagent Evaporation

 Prevent evaporation of the probe solution and other reagents during incubation. Because of the need for long incubation times drying of the reagents is a common problem. The use of good quality equipment is essential.

 

 

 If the probe or other reagents dry out on the section (usually at the edges) it can cause heavy, non-specific staining in areas.

 

 

This section of tonsil stained with ISH for kappa light chain has dried out during the formamide post-hybridization wash causing inconsistent, non-specific staining.
Avoid Reagent Evaporation

Step 99 - Standardize Washing Steps

 Use standardized washing steps throughout (duration, volume and form of agitation). This will ensure consistency of results.

 

 Results are very variable within runs with the same probe and between runs on different days. This can be due to different washing techniques used by different operators.

 

These sections of tonsil stained with ISH for kappa light chain show how washing affects the final result. Section A shows excessive background staining due to poor washing technique while section B was properly washed and has no background staining.
Standardize Washing Steps

Step 100 - Use Appropriate Controls

 Use appropriate controls with every run. This should include known positive tissue and a negative control using a non- specific probe.

 

 “We only do controls when our method doesn’t seem to work. If we did them for every run people wouldn’t bother to look at them.”

 

Section of tonsil stained with Poly d(T) positive control probe. The precise staining indicates that the tissue is well fixed and that RNA sequences will be well preserved.
Use Appropriate Controls

Step 101 - Evaluate Results Carefully

 Know what to look for and where to look when evaluating your test sections and controls after staining. Anyone undertaking ISH should have a fundamental knowledge of the underlying theory of the technique and where to find positive staining.

 

 If any staining is observed in test sections it is assumed the stains are satisfactory.

 

This negative control section of tonsil has gone through all steps of ISH but without the application of a probe. It shows hemosiderin, which has a natural brown color and additionally binds DAB which intensifies the color. This does not represent positive staining.
Evaluate Results Carefully

Click here to download the full 101 Steps to Better to Histology



This reference document is presented as a service to health care professionals by Leica Biosystems and has been compiled from available literature. Although every effort has been made to report faithfully the information, Leia Biosystems cannot be held responsible for the correctness. This document is not intended to be, and should not be construed as medical advice. For any use, the product information guides, inserts and operation manuals of the various drugs and devices should be consulted. Leica Biosystems and the editors disclaim any liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of drugs, devices, techniques or procedures described in this reference document.

Copyright © 2016 Leica Biosystems, a division of Leica Microsystems Inc.
All rights reserved. LEICA and the Leica Logo are registered trademarks of Leica Microsystems IR GmbH.